Skip to main content
Eyes Off ALX
Menu

ALX Surveillance

The state of surveillance in Alexandria

Flock is the surveillance company city residents increasingly recognize — both from press and from their automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras posted on poles around the city. Flock is also just one company Alexandria’s police are using across at least eight categories of surveillance technology. It’s possible other departments across the city are using even more surveillance tech, but we don’t know about it. No company, contract, or tech has ever gone before a public vote.

Because of the lack of government transparency, information on this page has been pieced together by city residents from a variety of sources: a map built by volunteers around the country, filings the Commonwealth requires, policies the police department wrote for itself, and records somebody had to go and request.

It is incomplete. Finding out what your own city operates should not take this much digging.

Why we start with Flock ALPR cameras

Flock ALPR cameras are not the only surveillance technology the city of Alexandria uses. The city also runs cell site simulators, drones, GPS trackers, and more, from a variety of vendors. All of it deserves the same public disclosure process.

Flock cameras come first on this page because residents can actually see and document them. ALPR cameras bolted to a pole are visible from the sidewalk, while a cell site simulator or a software license is not. Flock ALPR cameras are also the one system the city of Alexandria has been forced to disclose the most about, in part as a reaction to mounting concerns with the vendor. Flock certainly should not still have the keys to our city’s sensitive data. But, let’s be clear, we also don’t want another manufacturer of ALPRs to quietly replace Flock without meaningful public input — a strategy used by police departments and city councils across the country.

For more on what Flock is and the concerns around how it’s used, see our FAQs.

Where the cameras are

This is DeFlock’s crowd-sourced map, opened on Alexandria. Volunteers built it by walking around and noting what is visible from the sidewalk. Zoom in and find your own street.

Source: deflock.org, where you can also add a camera they have missed.

The Alexandria Times found that Flock cameras were disproportionately concentrated in lower-income neighborhoods (and echoed patterns of heavier deployment in predominantly Black, high-poverty areas elsewhere) but largely absent from high-crime areas like Old Town and Potomac Yard. Such placement raises concerns that the camera locations reflect surveillance bias rather than crime-driven need.

Two maps of Alexandria from the Alexandria Times. The first plots Flock camera locations over 2024 median family income by neighborhood; the second plots the same cameras over the density of crimes reported in 2025.
A Times reporter catalogued the Flock cameras listed on the crowd-sourced tracking site DeFlock.org and visited each camera listing in-person, confirming whether the cameras were actually there. He also found eight additional cameras in the city. The income map was created using 2024 median family income data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The crime map was created using block addresses from Alexandria Police Department crime reports in 2025, geocoded into coordinates by the Census Bureau and Geocodia. (DATA/ALEXANDRIA TIMES, U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, GEOCODIA, ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; MAPS/JAMES LIBRESCO, JESSICA KIM VIA QGIS) Source: https://alextimes.com/local-news/city-under-watch-times-uncovers-more-flock-cameras-than-previously-disclosed/.

Who can access Alexandria’s Flock data

At a minimum, Alexandria Police Department (APD) staff, APD sharing partners, and Flock have access to Alexandria’s Flock ALPR data. But the full picture is more complicated than the city ALPR portal and transparency efforts suggest:

“Who can see this data” is a basic oversight question, and our city can’t answer it confidently or consistently for ALPRs.

What the city discloses*

  • 61 APD Flock ALPR cameras
  • A 21-day retention period
  • A list of prohibited uses
  • 30-day search session counts, which recently ranged from 322 to 479 sessions
  • List of 161 outside agencies with data access

What it does not

  • Where the cameras are
  • What those searches were for
  • Which of the 161 agencies actually ran them
  • What its audits found, or whether any were done
  • When Flock’s latest contract was signed, and for how long
  • How Flock’s contract with Alexandria has changed over time
  • What agencies have accessed Alexandria’s data, and when
  • Whose data Alexandria accesses
  • Why transparency dashboard changes occur
  • How to reconcile differences between the city portal and the APD transparency page
  • What defines a “search session”
  • What risk/benefit analysis of ALPR technology was conducted and, if none, a stated policy rationale

*And this number keeps changing.

Source: Alexandria Brief, “Alexandria’s Flock page now lists the 161 Virginia agencies that can search its cameras”

It’s not just Flock

Virginia law requires every police department to report annually to the state which surveillance technologies it used, accessed, or procured. Alexandria’s filing for July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 reports 8 categories in use. None of them has been the subject of a Council hearing. We had to request this filing to read it; the city has never volunteered it.

Filed with the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services under Va. Code § 9.1-116.10 by Sergeant Oliver Dunn. Category names below are quoted exactly as they appear on the state’s form.

  • International mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) catchers and other cell site simulators

    Devices that impersonate a cell tower so nearby phones connect to them. Alexandria has never discussed this publicly.

  • Automatic license plate readers (like Flock)

  • Closed-circuit television cameras

  • Video and audio monitoring or recording technology, such as Body-Worn Cameras, other surveillance cameras, and wide-angle cameras

  • Tools, including software and hardware, used to gain access to a computer, computer service, or computer network

  • Software designed to integrate or analyze data from surveillance technology, including surveillance target tracking and predictive policing software

    A broad category. Checking it tells us the department uses surveillance-analysis software; it does not tell us which products, and it is not by itself evidence of predictive policing.

  • Drones

  • GPS Trackers

Show the categories the department marked as not applicable
  • Electronic toll readers
  • Facial recognition technologies
  • Other biometric surveillance technologies, including voice, iris, and gait-recognition software and databases
  • Mobile DNA capture technology
  • Gunshot detection and location hardware and servicesWorth stating plainly: the department reports it has none. Alexandria does not operate gunshot detection.
  • X-ray vans
  • Surveillance enabled or capable lightbulbs or light fixtures
  • Social media monitoring software
  • Through-the-wall radar or similar imaging technology
  • Passive scanners of radio networks
  • Long-range Bluetooth and other wireless-scanning devices
  • Radio-frequency I.D. (RFID) scanners
  • Any third party service or third party subscription that allows access to any form of surveillance technology or the data therefrom

The filing also reports assistance received from NVERS — Northern Virginia Emergency Response System (training on counter surveillance systems, Dedrone, etc.)

None of this has had a public hearing

A search of the city’s legislative records turns up no docket item, in any year, for Flock, license plate readers, or automated license plate recognition. The purchases and every renewal since have been handled administratively, by the Purchasing Division.

Based on FOIA, we believe the most recent renewal was signed in April of 2026 — but we still don’t have a clear answer as to exactly what contracts we have signed, under what terms, and when they end.

What we still don’t know

Every one of these questions could be answered in a public hearing.

  • When was Flock's contract signed, when does it end, and what are the conditions for termination?
  • What is the justification for 21-day ALPR retention defaults that makes Alexandria differently situated from other communities with shorter retention?
  • Which of the 161 agencies with access have searched Alexandria police Flock ALPR data, and what were they looking for?
  • Before the 2025 Virginia ALPR statute took effect, was our Flock ALPR data shared with out-of-state agencies or the federal government?
  • How would police audits of Flock ALPR data regulate external use, if at all? How does Alexandria police authenticate stated ALPR use category? What is the most common ALPR use category used by Alexandria police?
  • Is there strong evidence ALPR technology reduces crime and, if so, what types of crime?
  • What is Alexandria Police Department using other listed surveillance technologies for? Under what circumstances? What oversight applies?